5 Jan
2009
5 Jan
'09
3:17 p.m.
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 09:54:56AM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
Technically it could be possible to add the new members (mask, *values) to the existing soc_enum structure, which could reduce the amount of new code needed to handle this new type. At least the snd_soc_info_value_enum_double, dapm_connect_value_mux, dapm_value_mux_update_power functions can be removed if I modify the soc_enum instead of introducing the new soc_value_enum.
Appled both, thanks. It'd be good to merge the implementation of the new type as you say above but that doesn't affect the external interface so can easily be done as a later patch.