11 Jan
2013
11 Jan
'13
4:22 p.m.
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 04:05:53PM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
What do you mean by 'separate'? Maybe this is was causes the confusion. Do you mean a separate DAPM control, like DAPM_SWITCH? That's not what the patch does it creates a virtual kcontrol, which can be used to control a mixers input. It's the pendant to SOC_DAPM_ENUM_VIRT not to
The issue I'm seeing is that it sounds like this isn't joined up with the mute control (as it's a virtual control).
SND_SOC_DAPM_VIRT_MUX. I realize that the commit message may have been a bit ambiguous in that regard.
It's the virtual bit that's concerning me here so I don't think that's really it.