Hello.
Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 01:35:01PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
[Reflowed into 80 columns.]
My concerns is that the V4L2-specific part of the code should be at drivers/media. I prefer that the specific MFD I/O part to be at drivers/mfd, just like the other drivers.
Currently that's not the case - the I/O functionality is not in any meaningful sense included in the MFD, it's provided by the V4L portion.
I've been away for two and a half weeks so I haven't been able to comment...
But before I start to make changes, I'd still like to ask for a comment on my original plan, which was to have the I/O functions in the MFD driver and also have there things like interrupt handling etc.
My vision was that the MFD part would have the application logic and the child drivers would be just true interfaces to the core functionality, because I kind of saw the children to be of equal importance and because the codec and the v4l2 driver share some controls like for example the volume control.
If you'd care to take a look an earlier version of the MFD driver here:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.video-input-infrastructure/2360...
So the question is if I put only the I/O stuff into the MFD driver or can I have the other application logic there as well?
Thanks, Matti