On 7/6/20 4:05 AM, Piotr Maziarz wrote:
Values have no representation in UCM file, therefore there is no need to
Sorry, I don't get the logical assertion here. What is the link or dependency between UCM and topology?
populate them. Also memory for values wasn't allocated which was causing undefined behaviour.
Change-Id: I86b990d20808091eb61fb6710b35a0c1f1cbce10
src/topology/ctl.c | 5 +---- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/topology/ctl.c b/src/topology/ctl.c index 0aa49ab..02e482e 100644 --- a/src/topology/ctl.c +++ b/src/topology/ctl.c @@ -1367,11 +1367,8 @@ int tplg_decode_control_enum1(snd_tplg_t *tplg, et->texts = tplg_calloc(heap, sizeof(char *) * ec->items); if (!et->texts) return -ENOMEM;
for (i = 0; i < ec->items; i++) {unsigned int j = i * sizeof(int) * ENUM_VAL_SIZE;
for (i = 0; i < ec->items; i++) et->texts[i] = ec->texts[i];
et->values[i] = (int *)&ec->values[j];}}
et->map = tplg_calloc(heap, sizeof(struct snd_tplg_channel_map_template));