Hi Jiri,
On 19.12.2016 11:53, Jiri Kosina wrote:
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016, Dennis Wassenberg wrote:
"led_set_func_hid_lenovo" is set to "hid_lenovo_led_set"
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HID_LENOVO) +static int hda_fixup_thinkpad_hid_prepare(struct hda_codec *codec) +{
- struct hda_gen_spec *spec = codec->spec;
- int ret = 0;
- if (!is_thinkpad(codec))
return -ENODEV;- if (!led_set_func_hid_lenovo)
led_set_func_hid_lenovo = symbol_request(hid_lenovo_led_set);"hid_lenovo_led_set" is introduced in "[PATCH v2 2/2] hda: thinkpad_helper: Add support for hid-lenovo LED control". This means that "[PATCH 4/4] hda: thinkpad_helper: Add support for hid-lenovo LED control" can only work with applied "[PATCH 1/4] hid-lenovo: Add support for X1 Tablet cover special keys" and "[PATCH v2 2/2] hda: thinkpad_helper: Add support for hid-lenovo LED control".
Ah, okay, I wasn't aware of the other patchset. These two probably should be merged together. Is the other 2-patch set merged in any tree already? Where has it been submitted to?
No 1/4, 2/4 and 3/4 are currently not merged to any tree. I reworked 1/4, 2/4 and 3/4 because of some comments from Benjamin Tissoires (mail from 14th September 2016).
The patches are submitted to all recipients at the To, CC-Line (e.g. linux-input mailing list).
Maybe I can merge 2/4 and 4/4 together. This is all for LED control. 1/4 is for key/input handling and 3/4 is a special FNLock handling where I should use a separate patch.
Currently I have no feedback regarding the reworked linux-input specific code. I hope I will get it soon :)
Best regards,
Dennis