At Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:45:02 +0200, pavel.hofman@ivitera.com wrote:
From: Pavel Hofman pavel.hofman@ivitera.com
Signed-off-by: Pavel Hofman pavel.hofman@ivitera.com
diff --git a/pci/ice1712/ice1712.h b/pci/ice1712/ice1712.h --- a/pci/ice1712/ice1724.c +++ b/pci/ice1712/ice1724.c @@ -120,7 +122,7 @@ static inline int stdclock_is_spdif_master(struct snd_ice1712 *ice)
static inline int is_pro_rate_locked(struct snd_ice1712 *ice) {
- return ice->is_spdif_master(ice) || PRO_RATE_LOCKED;
- return (!ice->is_spdif_master(ice)) && PRO_RATE_LOCKED;
What is the reason of this change of logic?
@@ -210,6 +212,16 @@ static void snd_vt1724_set_gpio_mask(struct snd_ice1712 *ice, unsigned int data) outb((data >> 16) & 0xff, ICEREG1724(ice, GPIO_WRITE_MASK_22)); inw(ICEREG1724(ice, GPIO_WRITE_MASK)); /* dummy read for pci-posting */ } +static unsigned int snd_vt1724_get_gpio_mask(struct snd_ice1712 *ice) +{
- unsigned int mask;
- if (!ice->vt1720)
mask = (unsigned int)inb(ICEREG1724(ice, GPIO_WRITE_MASK_22));- else
mask = 0;- mask = (mask << 16) | inw(ICEREG1724(ice, GPIO_WRITE_MASK));
- return mask;
+}
Put this into the previous patch.
@@ -661,12 +673,16 @@ static int snd_vt1724_set_pro_rate(struct snd_ice1712 *ice, unsigned int rate, return (rate == ice->cur_rate) ? 0 : -EBUSY; }
- old_rate = ice->get_rate(ice);
- if (force || (old_rate != rate))
ice->set_rate(ice, rate);- else if (rate == ice->cur_rate) {
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ice->reg_lock, flags);return 0;
- if (force || !ice->is_spdif_master(ice)) {
/* force means the rate was switched by ucontrol, otherwise* setting clock rate for internal clock mode */old_rate = ice->get_rate(ice);if (force || (old_rate != rate))ice->set_rate(ice, rate);else if (rate == ice->cur_rate) {spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ice->reg_lock, flags);return 0;}
This should be related with the change above...
thanks,
Takashi