22 Feb
2012
22 Feb
'12
2:30 p.m.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 07:00:09PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 13:21 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
For the non-cyclic DMAs the idea of emulating at the dmaengine layer does seem very sensible but if that's hard then having the code at the ASoC level and pushing it down later seems fine. We do have several platforms with non-cyclic DMA so it's a general need.
I think this should be pushed to dmaengine rather than in ASoC. That way ASoC can always request circular and we emulate the behavior in dmaengine for dmacs who don't support this
That's what I just said. I'm just saying that if for some reason it's going to be difficult to implement I don't mind carrying code at the ASoC layer while that work is done.