9 Aug
2011
9 Aug
'11
5:41 p.m.
On 09/08/11 16:31, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 04:28:04PM +0100, Liam Girdwood wrote:
On 09/08/11 16:05, Mark Brown wrote:
Hrm? Subject line says WM8987...
But the diff said WM8750 iirc.
The issue being fixed is that the two devices are register compatible but for SPI we were only registering a device ID for wm8750, for I2C we'd got both IDs registered. The driver says wm8750 everywhere except the device IDs.
Ah, ok - I would have just used WM8750 in subject instead.
Acked-by: Liam Girdwood lrg@ti.com