Takashi Iwai wrote:
Oh, OK, then I must have missed that. Could you repost? And, this *must* go to 2.6.27, or not?
The only patch that needs to go into 2.6.27 is the one titled "alsa: make the CS4270 driver a new-style I2C driver" from me. This one is missing from Linus' tree.
I notice that "ALSA: ASoC: Fix another cs4270 error path" is in Linus' tree, but nothing else is.
Frankly, this series of cs4270 patches have been hard to handle because it was always unclear what the patch is for. The description "It's for 2.6.x" is too ambiguous because it doesn't always mean the purpose but also can mean the based version of the patch. So, a more clear sign would be really helpful for me at the next time...
I can do that, but I'm not sure how I can be any clearer. "This is for 2.6.x", to me at least, means exactly that - that this patch should be applied to the branch for 2.6.27, which is either a release candidate (i.e. 2.6.27-rcX) or a bug fix (i.e. 2.6.27.x), depending on what's next.
If you want me to use different wording, just tell me what I should say.