Am 23.02.2017 um 15:24 schrieb Takashi Iwai:
On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 15:11:46 +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 22.02.2017 um 19:47 schrieb Mark Brown:
Please use subject lines matching the style for the subsystem. This makes it easier for people to identify relevant patches.
Should I make it "ASoC: pxa: ..." then? SND_MMP_SOC selects SND_ARM, which in sound/arm/Kconfig says 'Drivers that are implemented on ASoC can be found in "ALSA for SoC audio support" section.', which confused me about whether or not this is an ASoC compliant driver if it selects a non-ASoC symbol.
It's a bug that selects SND_ARM there. I guess this was wrongly taken from the old example of AC97 ARM SoC code, which was fixed later. ASoC stuff is basically irrelevant from the legacy sound/arm/*.
Thanks, Takashi-san. I'll update as follows then.
diff --git a/sound/soc/pxa/Kconfig b/sound/soc/pxa/Kconfig index f8e1c06..aba7213 100644 --- a/sound/soc/pxa/Kconfig +++ b/sound/soc/pxa/Kconfig @@ -9,10 +9,9 @@ config SND_PXA2XX_SOC
config SND_MMP_SOC bool "SoC Audio for Marvell MMP chips" - depends on ARCH_MMP && ARM - select MMP_SRAM + depends on ARCH_MMP || COMPILE_TEST + select MMP_SRAM if ARM select SND_SOC_GENERIC_DMAENGINE_PCM - select SND_ARM help Say Y if you want to add support for codecs attached to the MMP SSPA interface.
Okay to do that in one patch or break up into three?
Regards, Andreas