14 Apr
2014
14 Apr
'14
11:36 p.m.
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 04:37:20PM +0800, Xiang Xiao wrote:
Signed-off-by: Xiang Xiao xiaoxiang@xiaomi.com
You should explain why you want to do this in the changelog - what's the problem that's being fixed or benefit?
- if (power != peer->power)
- if (peer->force || power != peer->power) dapm_mark_dirty(peer, "peer state change");
This doesn't correspond to your changelog - it *will* skip evaluating the widget power if the widget is forced. It's not clear why this would be a benefit.
- if (w->power == power)
- if (!w->force && w->power == power) return;
Similarly here.