21 Jul
2014
21 Jul
'14
1:53 p.m.
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:31:08PM -0500, Dan Murphy wrote:
+static int tas2552_class_d_en(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w,
struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, int event)
+{
- switch (event) {
- case SND_SOC_DAPM_PRE_PMU:
snd_soc_update_bits(w->codec, TAS2552_CFG_2,
TAS2552_CLASSD_EN_MASK, TAS2552_CLASSD_EN_MASK);
break;
- case SND_SOC_DAPM_POST_PMD:
snd_soc_update_bits(w->codec, TAS2552_CFG_2,
TAS2552_CLASSD_EN_MASK, 0);
break;
- }
- return 0;
+}
+static const struct snd_soc_dapm_widget tas2552_dapm_widgets[] = +{ +SND_SOC_DAPM_PRE("Class D Enable", tas2552_class_d_en), +SND_SOC_DAPM_POST("Class D Disable", tas2552_class_d_en), +SND_SOC_DAPM_POST("PLL Disable", tas2552_pll_disable), +};
This seems broken, having to use _PRE or _POST widgets for simple register writes (or almost anything really) should never be required and error prone - what is this actually trying to do? I'd expect the class D to be a PGA or OUTPUT widget and the PLL to be a SUPPLY widget.