On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 11:25:13AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
Hello Andy,
On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 12:02:50PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 10:47 AM Uwe Kleine-König u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de wrote:
These drivers don't use the driver_data member of struct i2c_device_id, so don't explicitly initialize this member.
This prepares putting driver_data in an anonymous union which requires either no initialization or named designators. But it's also a nice cleanup on its own.
There are some drivers that have other (than I²C) ID tables, which follow the same format. Can you also do the same with them for the sake of consistency?
I'm aware of these and plan to address them in a separate quest once I'm done with the i2c bits.
With this being promised, FWIW, Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko andy.shevchenko@gmail.com