31 Aug
2017
31 Aug
'17
12:38 p.m.
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 12:31:33PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
This is again a typical problem by such a trivial fix patch: the code looks as if it were trivial and correct, buried in a patch series that easily leads to the oversight by the maintainer's review.
Right, plus the amount of context that diff shows you.