Re: Semantics for _SX controls

On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 02:47:28PM -0500, David Rhodes wrote:

At the very least, cs53l30 should be patched. For the other drivers, using a

OK, great - thanks for checking.

macro that is more explicit about the signed bit field and removes the max/#-steps confusion would be an improvement. Something similar to SOC_DOUBLE_R_S_TLV could work.

I think as a first step it's best to refactor the current info() callback to be clearer then refactor further from there when it's clear what we're doing. I do think explicitly representing the sign bit as you suggest is probably sensible, if you or someone else with hardware could do those changes that'd be safer than me since I don't have any relevant hardware.