20 Mar
2010
20 Mar
'10
4:30 p.m.
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 03:54:29PM +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
Agreed. However, I believe when pushed to .34, it will get greater exposion, and regressions would more likely be found and get fixed. Faster than in your for-2.6.35 branch I mean.
I want it to at least appear in -next for a few days before backporting. That will get a moderate amount of automatic cover, and would make me much more happy about pushing a version for .34. If you want to do the backport to .34 that'd be helpful.