On 5/24/23 04:05, Charles Keepax wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 10:25:34AM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote:
Cirrus never intended to upstream dual licensed code, convert to GPL only.
Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com
Apologies for this but this was never our intention and I believe that it can be a little legally involved maintaining dual licensed kernel code. Fortunately not that many people outside of Cirrus have contributed to the files in question. I have CCed everyone who has contributed both internally and externally.
Pierre, Uwe,
Apologies for chasing but it would be really helpful to get an ack for this one, we need the approval of everyone who contributed to fix the licensing issue.
Sorry, I missed that you were asking me...
My only contribution is a two-character change in a header file to make cppcheck happy.
-int cs35l45_apply_patch(struct cs35l45_private *cs43l45); +int cs35l45_apply_patch(struct cs35l45_private *cs35l45);
I double-checked with Intel legal to be sure, and there's no issue with removing the BSD3 license.
Acked-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com