21 Jun
2011
21 Jun
'11
4:10 a.m.
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 05:43:58PM -0700, Peter Hsiang wrote:
I checked with hardware engineering and was told 0x40=RevA, 0x41=RevB..
Would a raw value or the use of a 0x3F bit mask be more acceptable?
I don't mind (though it does seem like the high bit isn't part of the actual data), it was just that it's a common error to assume that die revisions and package revisions correspond directly.