On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 06:06:30PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 18:00:22 +0100, Vinod Koul wrote:
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 05:10:17PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
On Wed, 06 Dec 2017 16:47:00 +0100, Vinod Koul wrote:
/* TODO: Read audio mode */
i++;
- }
Don't we use count argument for a sanity check?
Not really as that iterator runs on each bit:
for_each_set_bit(bit, &addr, 32) {
so it will not go on endlessly and can max out when all the bits being set and stop.
Yes, that shouldn't happen. OTOH, only looking at the callee side, one may wonder that the possible error would be dpn[] overflows the given array size (=count). Though, looking at both caller and callee, one realizes that it shouldn't happen, too.
Right :)
(But then again wonders why passing count argument at all :)
So we allocate memory for dpn ports by using hweight32(), and then fill up this memory by reading properties. Count here is used to access dpn[i] and fill data for each port from firmware and hence incremented every time..