On 30/05/14 12:23, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
Hi Ben
Hmm... This driver is still under developing. And it is very difficult for me to care about out-of-tree Linux.
Ok, but we really need to keep in mind that the DT should be kept as stable as possible. We may be out of tree at the moment, but we are trying our best to keep track and feed back our work. This is not helped if we have to do these changes when re-basing.
In my view this change does not help the readability, as we now have a large block of interrupts, where before we could easily work out which interrupt was mapped to which SSI.
OK. I thought that 1) current style was not good DT style 2) there is a chance to exchange it because upstream doesn't have user at this point. Can you accept if it can keep compatibility ?
I think the current method is the nicer, it keeps the descriptions each ssi as close as possible to the ssi. So, in answer to #1 I think it is the best.
In answer to #2, it would be nicer not to unless you have a good reason to do this.