14 Nov
2007
14 Nov
'07
8:56 p.m.
From: Ingo Molnar mingo@elte.hu Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:08:47 +0100
In fact this thread is the very example: David points out that on netdev some of those bugs were already discussed and resolved. Had it been all on lkml we'd all be aware of it.
That's a rediculious argument.
One other reason these bugs are resolved, is that the networking developers only need to subscribe to netdev and not have to listen to all the noise on lkml.
People who want to manage bugs know what list to look on and contact about problems.
Dumping even more crap on lkml is not the answer.