This is a left-over mistake from old code, the correct register offset is provided in kcontrol->private_value, not in the index. Cf. RayDAT case, where it has already been corrected.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Knoth adi@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de
diff --git a/sound/pci/rme9652/hdspm.c b/sound/pci/rme9652/hdspm.c index 585397b..5007f84 100644 --- a/sound/pci/rme9652/hdspm.c +++ b/sound/pci/rme9652/hdspm.c @@ -2312,7 +2312,7 @@ static int snd_hdspm_get_autosync_sample_rate(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, default: ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] = hdspm_get_s1_sample_rate(hdspm, - ucontrol->id.index-1); + kcontrol->private_value-1); } break;
@@ -3930,7 +3930,8 @@ static int snd_hdspm_get_sync_check(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, case 5: /* SYNC IN */ val = hdspm_sync_in_sync_check(hdspm); break; default: - val = hdspm_s1_sync_check(hdspm, ucontrol->id.index-1); + val = hdspm_s1_sync_check(hdspm, + kcontrol->private_value-1); } break;