On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 11:04:01PM -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
Currently the code deals with uevents at the bus level, but we only care for Slave events
What does this mean? I can't understand it, can you please provide more information on what you are doing here?
Suggested-by: Vinod Koul vkoul@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com
drivers/soundwire/bus.h | 2 ++ drivers/soundwire/bus_type.c | 3 +-- drivers/soundwire/slave.c | 1 + 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/bus.h b/drivers/soundwire/bus.h index cb482da914da..be01a5f3d00b 100644 --- a/drivers/soundwire/bus.h +++ b/drivers/soundwire/bus.h @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@
#define DEFAULT_BANK_SWITCH_TIMEOUT 3000
+int sdw_uevent(struct device *dev, struct kobj_uevent_env *env);
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI) int sdw_acpi_find_slaves(struct sdw_bus *bus); #else diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/bus_type.c b/drivers/soundwire/bus_type.c index bbdedce5eb26..5c18c21545b5 100644 --- a/drivers/soundwire/bus_type.c +++ b/drivers/soundwire/bus_type.c @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ int sdw_slave_modalias(const struct sdw_slave *slave, char *buf, size_t size) slave->id.mfg_id, slave->id.part_id); }
-static int sdw_uevent(struct device *dev, struct kobj_uevent_env *env) +int sdw_uevent(struct device *dev, struct kobj_uevent_env *env) { struct sdw_slave *slave; char modalias[32]; @@ -71,7 +71,6 @@ static int sdw_uevent(struct device *dev, struct kobj_uevent_env *env) struct bus_type sdw_bus_type = { .name = "soundwire", .match = sdw_bus_match,
- .uevent = sdw_uevent,
}; EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sdw_bus_type);
diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/slave.c b/drivers/soundwire/slave.c index c87267f12a3b..014c3ece1f17 100644 --- a/drivers/soundwire/slave.c +++ b/drivers/soundwire/slave.c @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ static void sdw_slave_release(struct device *dev) struct device_type sdw_slave_type = { .name = "sdw_slave", .release = sdw_slave_release,
- .uevent = sdw_uevent,
Align this with the other ones?
does this cause any different functionality?
thanks,
greg k-h