On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 10:13:10AM +0000, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
This part I agree. Unfortunately this was not done transparently...
b) the source file should have been renamed to match, if the name "crec" is a massive problem then it should also be a problem that "cplay.c->cplay" but "crec.c->crecord". If it's ok to have the source file called crec.c what's wrong with the binary it builds being called crec?
I dont mind renaming source as well..
I think bigger question is should we continue crec or crecord, my preference is latter.
c) it's a nuisance to have to change existing test systems and apps that launch "crec", or to create symlinks from crec->crecord.
Yeah agree, lets decide on one and stick to that, forever hopefully :)
Ok let's change to crecord for consistency with arecord, and I'll do a patch to rename the source to match.
Sounds good :)