31 Jul
2013
31 Jul
'13
3:25 p.m.
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 02:16:44PM +0100, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
Pointing it to a dummy work callback is cleaner than taking special cases in the code to bypass the flush_delayed_work_sync().
Why is this better than pointing at the normal work that you'd expect to be used there?