27 Mar
2024
27 Mar
'24
6:38 p.m.
On 27/03/24 20:28, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 04:16:52PM +0530, Vijendar Mukunda wrote:
@@ -115,7 +115,10 @@ static int acp_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pci, const struct pci_device_id *pci_id goto unregister_dmic_dev; }
- acp_init(chip);
- ret = acp_init(chip);
- if (ret)
return ret;
The return check is good but shouldn't this be a 'goto unregister_dmic_dev' like the above case so we do cleanup?
I do agree. Will modify the code and respin the patch series.