12 May
2020
12 May
'20
6:06 a.m.
Hi Ranjani
Thank you for feedback
I think snd_soc_dai_activity() is correct, *so far*.
Exceptions are soc-dapm.c :: snd_soc_dai_link_event_pre_pmu() soc-dapm.c :: snd_soc_dai_link_event()
(snip)
Can you agree below ?
- use runtime_activate()/deactivate() at above functions.
I am wondering what the original intention for having separate stream_active and active members for snd_soc_dai was.
I'm not sure...
With your proposal there wouldnt be a need for "active" anymore, isnt it?
Yeah, thus, my patch will remove it.
Thank you for your help !!
Best regards --- Kuninori Morimoto