Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 4/4] ALSA: pcm_dmaengine: Correct support for 3 physical bytes samples

On 07/02/2014 02:44 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:

On 07/02/2014 02:29 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:

...

In case of _3LE/_3BE formats the samples are stored in 3 consecutive bytes without padding it to 4 bytes. This means that the DMA needs to be able to support 3 bytes word length in order to read/write the samples from memory correctly. Originally the code treated 24 bits physical length samples as they were 32 bits which leads to corruption when playing or recording audio.

In snd_dmaengine_pcm_open() we should check the slave_caps of the dma if it supports DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_3_BYTES. Based on this information we initialize the runtime->hw.formats: if DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_3_BYTES is not supported or the slave_caps is not provided by the driver we mask out the 24 bits physical width sample formats so they will be not available for user space to pick. If the DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_3_BYTES is supported _3LE/_3BE formats will not be masked so later on they can be valid if both CPU and codec dai supports them.

Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi peter.ujfalusi@ti.com

sound/core/pcm_dmaengine.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/sound/core/pcm_dmaengine.c b/sound/core/pcm_dmaengine.c index d5611ec80381..519b500c5669 100644 --- a/sound/core/pcm_dmaengine.c +++ b/sound/core/pcm_dmaengine.c @@ -72,6 +72,8 @@ int snd_hwparams_to_dma_slave_config(const struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, buswidth = DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_1_BYTE; else if (bits == 16) buswidth = DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_2_BYTES;

• else if (bits == 24)

• buswidth = DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_3_BYTES;
  

  else if (bits <= 32) buswidth = DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES; else

@@ -292,8 +294,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_dmaengine_pcm_request_channel); int snd_dmaengine_pcm_open(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, struct dma_chan *chan) {

• struct snd_pcm_runtime *runtime = substream->runtime; struct dmaengine_pcm_runtime_data *prtd;

• int ret;

• struct dma_slave_caps dma_caps;

• bool dma_3bytes_supported = false;

• u64 fmt_mask = 0;

• int i, ret;

  if (!chan) return -ENXIO;

@@ -311,6 +317,37 @@ int snd_dmaengine_pcm_open(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,

substream->runtime->private_data = prtd;

• /*

• * Prepare formats mask for valid/allowed sample types. If the dma does
  

• * not support 3bytes word size, it needs to be masked out so user space
  

• * can not use the format which produces corrupted audio.
  

• * If the dma driver does not implement get_slave_caps callback, treat
  

• * it as no 3bytes word support.
  

• */
  

• if (!dma_get_slave_caps(prtd->dma_chan, &dma_caps)) {

• u32 addr_widths;
  

• if (substream->stream == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK)
  

• 	addr_widths = dma_caps.dstn_addr_widths;
  

• else
  

• 	addr_widths = dma_caps.src_addr_widths;
  

• if (addr_widths & BIT(DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_3_BYTES))
  

• 	dma_3bytes_supported = true;
  

• }
• for (i = 0; i <= SNDRV_PCM_FORMAT_LAST; i++) {

• int bits = snd_pcm_format_physical_width(i);
  

• if (bits == 24 && !dma_3bytes_supported)
  

• 	fmt_mask |= (1LL << i);
  

• }

per discussion over the irc with Lars we could extend the masking to other widths as well, which would look something like this: u32 addr_widths = BIT(DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_1_BYTE) | BIT(DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_2_BYTES) | BIT(DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES); ... /*

• Prepare formats mask for valid/allowed sample types. If the dma does
• not have support for the given physical word size, it needs to be
• masked out so user space can not use the format which produces
• corrupted audio.
• In case the dma driver does not implement the slave_caps the default
• assumption is that it supports 1, 2 and 4 bytes widths.

*/ if (!dma_get_slave_caps(prtd->dma_chan, &dma_caps)) { if (substream->stream == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK) addr_widths = dma_caps.dstn_addr_widths; else addr_widths = dma_caps.src_addr_widths; }

for (i = 0; i <= SNDRV_PCM_FORMAT_LAST; i++) { int bits = snd_pcm_format_physical_width(i);

switch (bits) { case 8: if (!(addr_widths & BIT(DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_1_BYTE))) fmt_mask |= (1LL << i); break; case 16: if (!(addr_widths & BIT(DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_2_BYTES))) fmt_mask |= (1LL << i); break; case 24: if (!(addr_widths & BIT(DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_3_BYTES))) fmt_mask |= (1LL << i); break; case 32: if (!(addr_widths & BIT(DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES))) fmt_mask |= (1LL << i); break; case 64: if (!(addr_widths & BIT(DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_8_BYTES))) fmt_mask |= (1LL << i); break; default: fmt_mask |= (1LL << i); break; } }

Is this sounds better?

Sounds good. I think we can assume that DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_1_BYTE = 1, ... So (addr_width & BIT(bits / 8)) should work fine and we do not need to duplicate the case branches.

The other thing is this should go into dmaengine_pcm_set_runtime_hwparams() where we also restrict the other hardware parameters based on the dmaengine capabilities.

- Lars