20 Jul
2022
20 Jul
'22
1:49 p.m.
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 9:25 PM Pierre-Louis Bossart < pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> wrote:
On 7/20/22 03:57, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> +static int imx8ulp_resume(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev) > +{ > + struct imx8ulp_priv *priv = (struct imx8ulp_priv *)sdev->pdata->hw_pdata; > + int i; > + > + imx8_enable_clocks(sdev, priv->clks); > + > + for (i = 0; i < DSP_MU_CHAN_NUM; i++) > + imx_dsp_request_channel(priv->dsp_ipc, i); > + > + return 0; is the assymetry between suspend and resume intentional? You are
missing
the update_bit for EXECUTE_BIT?
Yes, intentional. After resume the firmware is reloaded and EXECUTE_BIT will be updated at trigger DSP start.
That's worthy of a comment to help reviewers, thanks.
ok, thanks.
best regards wang shengjiu