3 Nov
2015
3 Nov
'15
6:58 p.m.
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 08:29:02PM +0800, Keyon wrote:
I'm having a hard time seeing the difference between this and what's going on in sst-acpi. They seem to be doing the same thing in slightly different ways, they both match tables of CODEC IDs to machine driver names with the distinction being that this doesn't provide a firmware filename whereas sst-acpi does but the mechanics of mapping a CODEC to a machine driver seem otherwise the same.
agree that it may be better if we can reuse(or merge with) sst driver (intel/common/sst-acpi.c) for SKL.
all drivers use different sst_machine structure... and data required is not same
--
~Vinod