On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 2:51 PM Miquel Raynal miquel.raynal@bootlin.com wrote:
Hi Rob,
Thanks for the review, one question below.
Rob Herring robh@kernel.org wrote on Mon, 02 Sep 2019 14:39:09 +0100:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 11:06:06PM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
Document the logicPD I2S FPGA block bindings in yaml.
Syntax verified with dt-doc-validate.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
.../bindings/sound/xlnx,logicpd-i2s.yaml | 57 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/xlnx,logicpd-i2s.yaml
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/xlnx,logicpd-i2s.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/xlnx,logicpd-i2s.yaml new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..cbff641af199 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/xlnx,logicpd-i2s.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause) +%YAML 1.2 +--- +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/sound/xlnx,logicpd-i2s.yaml# +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+title: Device-Tree bindings for Xilinx logicPD I2S FPGA block
+maintainers:
- Miquel Raynal miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
+description: |
- The IP supports I2S playback/capture audio. It acts as a slave and
- clocks should come from the codec. It only supports two channels and
- S16_LE format.
+properties:
- compatible:
- items:
- const: xlnx,logicpd-i2s
- reg:
- maxItems: 1
- description:
Base address and size of the IP core instance.
- interrupts:
- minItems: 1
- maxItems: 2
- items:
- description: tx interrupt
- description: rx interrupt
- description:
Either the Tx interruption or the Rx interruption or both.
The schema says either tx or both. Doesn't really matter here as it's just numbers.
I see , I'll drop the 'items' entry.
- interrupt-names:
- minItems: 1
- maxItems: 2
- items:
- const: tx
- const: rx
But here it does matter.
The easiest way to express this is:
oneOf:
- items:
- enum: [ tx, rx ]
- items:
- const: tx
- const: rx
Does this enforce an order? (I don't know if it matters, though, but in the bellow example I put the Rx interrupt first).
Yes. It does matter and should be defined what the order it.
Rob