29 Dec
2021
29 Dec
'21
1:04 p.m.
Hi Charles,
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 8:54 AM Charles Keepax ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com wrote:
Hmm... I might defer to Mark on this one. I totally agree your new code is more correct, however, I would have a slight worry about existing device trees not correctly specifying the GPIO. As in if existing systems had been specifying the GPIO correctly they are presumably currently broken. But I am not sure what the obvious solution would be, and I don't really have a good feel for how widely used this part is.
I could not find a single user of the cs4265 in linux-next.
The board I have does not connect a GPIO to the CS4264 reset line, so I am not affected by it.
Cheers