23 Jul
2008
23 Jul
'08
6:19 p.m.
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:49:50AM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
Mask is usually the same as mask, but hasn't this been written to allow a max smaller than the max? If so these two areas look wrong.
Yes, that's the idea.
if (power) { int i; /* power up has happended, increase volume to last level */ if (invert) {
// shouldn't this be // for (i = max; i > widget->saved_value; i--) for (i = mask; i > widget->saved_value; i--) // and this mask is right
I think so.
And this one should have used mask instead of max:
Looks like it, yes.