
Hi Rob,
On Wed, 2 Aug 2023 18:42:59 -0600 Rob Herring robh@kernel.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 05:02:23PM +0200, Herve Codina wrote:
A framer can be connected to the QMC HDLC. If present, this framer is the interface between the TDM used by the QMC HDLC and the E1/T1 line. The QMC HDLC can use this framer to get information about the line and configure the line.
Add an optional framer property to reference the framer itself.
Signed-off-by: Herve Codina herve.codina@bootlin.com
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,qmc-hdlc.yaml | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,qmc-hdlc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,qmc-hdlc.yaml index 8bb6f34602d9..bf29863ab419 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,qmc-hdlc.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,qmc-hdlc.yaml @@ -27,6 +27,11 @@ properties: Should be a phandle/number pair. The phandle to QMC node and the QMC channel to use.
- framer:
- $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
Now you've defined this property twice. Please avoid doing that.
I don't see what you mean.
I previously defined the framer property at the framer-codec node as it is a framer consumer (it was a mistake because this framer-codec node is a child of the framer node but that's an other story).
Here, at the qmc-hdlc node, I define this property in order to use the framer as a consumer too.
What is wrong ?
Best regards, Hervé
- description:
phandle to the framer node
required:
- compatible
- fsl,qmc-chan
-- 2.41.0