Hi, Geoffrey, have you tried adding "ehci_hcd.dyndbg=+p" to your kernel boot options?
It will give you additional debugging information, and if you need more debugging information you can always use printk() and recompile your modules.
Note that your issue seems more related to USB kernel development than ALSA development, still, impossible to say where the fix will land without tracing the problem first.
Best of luck, Geraldo Nascimento
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 2:27 PM Geoffrey D. Bennett g@b4.vu wrote:
Hi there,
I'm trying to track down an issue with my Scarlett Gen 2 mixer driver that has been reported by a few people, and I can now reliably reproduce the issue, but I need some help in figuring out where exactly the issue is and how to fix it please.
The issue only occurs when attempting to use the interface on a USB port using ehci-pci. xhci_hcd USB ports work fine.
The issue occurs when sending the first vendor-specific USB command, but only when sending from the kernel driver. Sending the same USB packets from user-space works fine(!).
I did initially think that the fault could have been due to earlier USB messages putting the device into a state where it would reject the vendor-specific USB commands, but I have carefully ruled that out & have gotten identical usbmon traces from device power-on up until the device responds differently, the only difference beforehand being whether the USB packet was sent from the kernel driver or user-space.
The messages look like this in "usbmon -s 10000 -fu" when sent from user-space (or when sent from the kernel driver when the interface is plugged in to an xhci_hcd port):
ffff888125855200 1006026497 S Ci:2:040:0 s a1 00 0000 0005 0018 24 < ffff888125855200 1006026680 C Ci:2:040:0 0 24 = 66191018 73190604 01000000 01000000 00040000 00000000
And like this when sent from the kernel driver when the interface is plugged in to an ehci-pci port:
ffff88810487a300 3686673995 S Ci:2:036:0 s a1 00 0000 0005 0018 24 < ffff88810487a300 3692178724 C Ci:2:036:0 -2 0
Identical messages sent according to usbmon, but they must be different somehow!
The kernel code to send that message looks like this:
return snd_usb_ctl_msg( dev, usb_sndctrlpipe(dev, 0), usb_req, USB_RECIP_INTERFACE | USB_TYPE_CLASS | USB_DIR_IN, 0, interface, buf, size);
and helper.c snd_usb_ctl_msg() then calls usb_control_msg().
For sending arbitrary USB packets from user-space for testing, I'm using libusb and:
int ret = usb_control_msg( devh, reqtype, request, value, index, buf, size, 1000 );
So, I presume usbmon isn't giving me the full story? How can I determine the difference between the kernel and the user-space usb_control_msg() functions? I see that I can #define EHCI_URB_TRACE in ehci-hcd.c. Can anyone with more experience than me let me know if I'm going in the right direction to track this down?
Thanks, Geoffrey.