21 Oct
2013
21 Oct
'13
12:09 p.m.
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 09:52:00 +0100 Russell King - ARM Linux linux@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
NAK. It can occur.
In which case? And, what would be the right treatment?
priv->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL); priv->extclk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "extclk");
Supplying the first clock to this driver without a separate "extclk" via clkdev will return it as the second clock.
Again, NAK. Your change is against the principles of the clk API.
You are right.
Mark, please forget about this patch.
Thanks.
--
Ken ar c'hentaƱ | ** Breizh ha Linux atav! **
Jef | http://moinejf.free.fr/