On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:09 AM, Mark Brown broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
So, I just said to the SPEAr guys that I really want to see support for non-cyclic dmaengine added to the helper library rather than open coding. We're seeing lots of platforms moving to dmaengine (as well as those that are in already yours is one of three out of tree platforms I'm aware of that have actively submitted stuff) and with this number of platforms we really need to get stuff factored out - there's enough people working on these platforms that it should be possible to add the support to the dmaengine library code.
Do you mean you don't accept our platform/machine driver's patches unless your DMA library will have supported non-cyclic dmaengine ? Or if I'll modify your minor comments, can you accept our patches ?
thanks.