9 Aug
2013
9 Aug
'13
4:58 p.m.
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 03:37:46PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
On 08/09/2013 11:05 AM, Bard Liao wrote:
Does "virtual switch control" mean a switch control which will not touch the codec's register actually?
Yes. But Mark seems to prefer the solution using {PRE,POST}_REG events.
I don't mind that much, neither way should be a problem for the framework.