The patch
ASoC: soc-core: move soc_probe_dai() next to soc_remove_dai()
has been applied to the asoc tree at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-5.4
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.
Thanks, Mark
From a7d44f78063d642406132c2ed1dc6033d0d03cfe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kuninori Morimoto kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 09:15:06 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: soc-core: move soc_probe_dai() next to soc_remove_dai()
It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired function/naming, like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc. But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired, etc. It is easy to create bug at the such code, and it will be difficult to debug.
This patch moves soc_probe_dai() next to soc_remove_dai() which is paired function.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87zhjkor1x.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org --- sound/soc/soc-core.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-core.c b/sound/soc/soc-core.c index 0a13f9461303..3ca5a21bfa6a 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-core.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-core.c @@ -1106,6 +1106,26 @@ static void soc_remove_dai(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, int order) dai->probed = 0; }
+static int soc_probe_dai(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, int order) +{ + int ret; + + if (dai->probed || + dai->driver->probe_order != order) + return 0; + + ret = snd_soc_dai_probe(dai); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_err(dai->dev, "ASoC: failed to probe DAI %s: %d\n", + dai->name, ret); + return ret; + } + + dai->probed = 1; + + return 0; +} + static void soc_rtd_free(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd); /* remove me */ static void soc_remove_link_dais(struct snd_soc_card *card) { @@ -1411,26 +1431,6 @@ static int soc_rtd_init(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd, const char *name) return 0; }
-static int soc_probe_dai(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, int order) -{ - int ret; - - if (dai->probed || - dai->driver->probe_order != order) - return 0; - - ret = snd_soc_dai_probe(dai); - if (ret < 0) { - dev_err(dai->dev, "ASoC: failed to probe DAI %s: %d\n", - dai->name, ret); - return ret; - } - - dai->probed = 1; - - return 0; -} - static int soc_link_dai_pcm_new(struct snd_soc_dai **dais, int num_dais, struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd) {