Hi Daniel,
-----Original Message----- From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel Vetter Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 9:05 PM To: Jani Nikula Cc: Yang, Libin; alsa-devel@alsa-project.org; tiwai@suse.de; intel- gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/i915: implement set_ncts callback
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 03:00:13PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Mon, 10 Aug 2015, libin.yang@intel.com wrote:
- n_low = n & 0xfff;
- n_up = (n >> 12) & 0xff;
- /* 4. set the N/CTS */
- tmp = I915_READ(HSW_AUD_CFG(pipe));
- tmp |= AUD_CONFIG_N_PROG_ENABLE;
- tmp &= ~AUD_CONFIG_UPPER_N_MASK;
- tmp |= (n_up << AUD_CONFIG_UPPER_N_SHIFT);
- tmp &= ~AUD_CONFIG_LOWER_N_MASK;
- tmp |= (n_low << AUD_CONFIG_LOWER_N_SHIFT);
You could squash the ors and ands together.
Also read-modify-write considered evil. If you need to save a few bits please be explicit about it like
tmp &= BITS_WE_WANT_TO_KEEP;
OK, I will try to use this format.
if there's no bits to keep just start out with 0. If we have too much rwm to hw registers then probably something with the overall design is botched, e.g. with the pipe config precomputation we managed to remove almost all the rwm code for modesets.
Yes, if we can set the register by starting out with 0, it will be better. But in this case, there are some reserved bits. We should reserve its bits for compatibility, I think.
-Daniel
- I915_WRITE(HSW_AUD_CFG(pipe), tmp);
- return 0;
+}
static const struct i915_audio_component_ops
i915_audio_component_ops = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE, .get_power = i915_audio_component_get_power, .put_power = i915_audio_component_put_power, .codec_wake_override =
i915_audio_component_codec_wake_override,
.get_cdclk_freq = i915_audio_component_get_cdclk_freq,
- .set_ncts = i915_audio_component_set_ncts,
};
static int i915_audio_component_bind(struct device *i915_dev,
1.9.1
Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
-- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
-- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch