6 Jun
2011
6 Jun
'11
12:39 p.m.
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 10:29:49AM +0100, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
Yes, in the previous version of the rbtree code, it was saving it in the node itself. I was planning to have a separate block with the default values for the block based version but haven't yet got around to that.
Oh, good - I was wondering how I'd missed this when doing initial testing on rbtree code. If you're removing features like this you really need to call it out in the changelog, this is quite a nasty regression as we can easily end up doing a couple of orders of magnitude more I/O on a slow bus than we were expecting to.