On Aug 9 2016 00:07, Takashi Iwai wrote:
On Mon, 08 Aug 2016 10:37:21 +0200, Takashi Sakamoto wrote:
On Aug 8 2016 16:04, Takashi Iwai wrote:
On Sun, 07 Aug 2016 11:48:47 +0200, Takashi Sakamoto wrote:
In former commit, actual operations of each ioctl command get argument in kernel space. Copying from/to user space is performed outside of the function.
This commit optimizes to the new design.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Sakamoto o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp
While it's OK to split to small patches if you prefer, you don't have to do so. Basically all the rest are doing the same thing (strip copy_*_user() and replace to the pointer accesses), and it's rather boring to read repeated mails.
The mail server of alsa-project.org has a limitation of the size of one message. It shrinks developers to split commit to a small parts. Not from my taste.
Yeah, that's sometimes annoying, indeed. Jaroslav, could you raise the bar to allow larger patches, or drop this restriction?
It's not what I want. I've already followed to the restriction for this several years. The restriction is still OK as long as I can split my patches as small parts and I'm not objected for them.
You completely puzzled me. Finally, what you'd like me to do?????
Regards
Takashi Sakamoto