19 Feb
2015
19 Feb
'15
1:33 p.m.
Am 19.02.2015 um 10:44 schrieb Mark Brown:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 07:25:58PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
static const struct of_device_id snow_of_match[] = {
- { .compatible = "google,snow-audio-max98089", }, { .compatible = "google,snow-audio-max98090", }, { .compatible = "google,snow-audio-max98091", }, { .compatible = "google,snow-audio-max98095", },
Since we completely ignore the CODEC in the property might it not be better to just add a plain old snow-audio compatible and bind to that, that way we don't need these driver updates? Just the "snow" bit should be enough to know it's one of this class of machines.
Personally I don't mind either way, but I'd rather leave that decision to Google/Samsung people.
With all those Tegra and Rockchip based Chromebooks popping up, are there any further Exynos based Chromebooks planned using this driver, or is it the last of its kind?
Cheers, Andreas
--
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Jennifer Guild, Dilip Upmanyu,
Graham Norton; HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)