4 Oct
2008
4 Oct
'08
4:35 p.m.
At Fri, 3 Oct 2008 18:47:14 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 10:20:53AM -0700, Troy Kisky wrote:
Why the WM509 prefix instead of WM8510?
Gah. Because I sent an incorrect, buggy, version of the patch. Trying to do too many things at once :/
Takashi, please don't apply.
OK.
Will you send a correct one later, or is the fix totally bogus?
Takashi