On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 09:53:21AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Hi Shawn,
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 4:55 AM, Shawn Guo shawn.guo@linaro.org wrote:
What tree? I tested linux-next 20130730 and did not see the error.
Just tested it with linux-next 20130730 and could reproduce the error there as well.
You can apply the attached patch and you will see the error.
I see the difference here. With my build, I only set CONFIG_SND_IMX_SOC to 'm', while you set CONFIG_SND to 'm'.
As imx-pcm-fiq is only used by imx-ssi and imx-pcm-dma is pretty small, I thought that it's not worth to build imx-pcm-fiq and imx-pcm-dma as modules, and having them be 'bool' and then link them into imx-ssi and fsl-ssi should also work. But I see Markus is working on fsl-ssi to adopt imx-pcm-fiq. And imx-pcm-fiq is still big, it makes some sense to build them as modules. So,
Acked-by: Shawn Guo shawn.guo@linaro.org
Shawn