On 3/15/24 13:06, Jerome Brunet wrote:
On Fri 15 Mar 2024 at 02:21, Jan Dakinevich jan.dakinevich@salutedevices.com wrote:
Add "amlogic,a1-sound-card" compatible string alias to "amlogic,axg-sound-card".
Signed-off-by: Jan Dakinevich jan.dakinevich@salutedevices.com
.../devicetree/bindings/sound/amlogic,axg-sound-card.yaml | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/amlogic,axg-sound-card.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/amlogic,axg-sound-card.yaml index 5db718e4d0e7..492b41cc8ccd 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/amlogic,axg-sound-card.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/amlogic,axg-sound-card.yaml @@ -14,7 +14,11 @@ allOf:
properties: compatible:
- const: amlogic,axg-sound-card
- oneOf:
- const: amlogic,axg-sound-card- items:- const: amlogic,a1-sound-card- const: amlogic,axg-sound-cardI know the rule about SoC related name but it is different here. This does not describe HW in the SoC.
The axg sound card is just a name, much like simple-card or audio-graph-card. I could have named it "amlogic,my-awesome-card"
We would not add "amlogic,a1-simple-card", would we ?
It is purely a software component, which aggregate HW ones.
audio-aux-devs: $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
So, I can drop a couple of commits like this. Right?