On Fri, 2018-01-05 at 13:34 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 1:22 PM, Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Fri, 2018-01-05 at 13:06 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 5:47 PM, Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com wrote:
"Subset of Intel ASoC drivers is an existing user of this API when they need to find an actual instance of the codec device based on its ACPI HID."
And why do they need the name (and not something else)?
I don't know the guts of Intel ASoC implementation, so, can't answer this without investigation.
Pierre, can you elaborate this piece?
So, acpi_dev_get_name() then?
It would be somewhat clearer to call it acpi_dev_get_first_match_name() IMO.
Otherwise it may not be clear what name this is going to return.
Works for me.