20 Jul
2010
20 Jul
'10
10:59 a.m.
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 09:53:22AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
I don't really know how many of these driver would require new TLV entry, but the twl4030, and tpa6130a2 (for tpa6140a2 chip) does not needed new entry, just modification of the TLV items.
If we're going to go down this road all of them will at least require modification.
I agree with Mark in regards, that the decision making is strictly policy/userspace stuff, but I also think that the drivers should also provide as much, and as accurate information to user space to make this decision (if it is in form of overlapped mapping, than like that).
I agree here, I just think that the overlapping ranges don't add anything to the information that's being provided.