On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 02:29:58PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 11:27:08PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 11:24:58AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
I'm having a hard time seeing the difference between this and what's going on in sst-acpi. They seem to be doing the same thing in slightly different ways, they both match tables of CODEC IDs to machine driver names with the distinction being that this doesn't provide a firmware filename whereas sst-acpi does but the mechanics of mapping a CODEC to a machine driver seem otherwise the same.
I don't disagree with your observation, the code does same stuff and only difference is the data we require here, so commonizing becomes tricky
The only difference in data appears to be a firmware file name?
The one atom code uses is quite different, but i did manage to create a global one and ignore those in other places
I will send updated patches moving all to common apci match code and then add SKL to common code
Thanks