20 Mar
2010
20 Mar
'10
3:54 p.m.
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 07:54:22PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 07:39:58PM +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
Thanks! I assume this is going to be taken for .34 and .35?
I've applied it for 2.6.35 only at present, I'd rather let it cook for a little before picking it back - like you I can only test a limited set of architectures. Unfortunately it doesn't cherry pick backwards either, but the updates required do appear to be trivial.
Agreed. However, I believe when pushed to .34, it will get greater exposion, and regressions would more likely be found and get fixed. Faster than in your for-2.6.35 branch I mean.
Daniel